Explain why the expression 6 + 2(x - 4) is not in simplest form.

Unlock your potential to excel as a paraeducator with comprehensive study questions and methods designed to deepen your understanding. Access questions with explanations and enhance your readiness for the CODESP exam!

Multiple Choice

Explain why the expression 6 + 2(x - 4) is not in simplest form.

Explanation:
Distributing the outside factor is the step that often makes expressions simpler. Here, 2 is multiplying the whole inside, so apply the distributive property: 2(x - 4) becomes 2x - 8. Then you have 6 + 2x - 8, which combines to 2x - 2. So the original expression isn’t in simplest form because the distribution hasn’t been done yet. It’s not about the number of parentheses—removing them is done by distributing. It’s not already simplified, since 6 and -8 can be combined to -2, and the result 2x - 2 is the concise form. The issue isn’t the coefficients being integers; the key is that distributing the 2 across the parentheses is needed.

Distributing the outside factor is the step that often makes expressions simpler. Here, 2 is multiplying the whole inside, so apply the distributive property: 2(x - 4) becomes 2x - 8. Then you have 6 + 2x - 8, which combines to 2x - 2. So the original expression isn’t in simplest form because the distribution hasn’t been done yet.

It’s not about the number of parentheses—removing them is done by distributing. It’s not already simplified, since 6 and -8 can be combined to -2, and the result 2x - 2 is the concise form. The issue isn’t the coefficients being integers; the key is that distributing the 2 across the parentheses is needed.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy